| Mirage Source http://miragesource.net/forums/ |
|
| MSCPP Beta 0.1 http://miragesource.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=123&t=3985 |
Page 3 of 41 |
| Author: | Tony [ Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Ooo! I understand it quite better now, thanks, you sexy beasts. |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Wed Mar 04, 2009 3:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
|| \/ |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Working version almost done. I just need more time. Packets are 100% working, but I need to fix the server it self, because it's not handling them right xD, but packet transfer is 100%) I'm just not sure witch version I'm converting to C++ xD I think it is 3.(40-60) or something like that but I'm not sure. When I release it I'll be really thankful if someone check that for me. |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Building and compiling takes forever O___O, what's your resolve for this? |
|
| Author: | GIAKEN [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
What compiler are you using? |
|
| Author: | Tony [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 6:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
GIAKEN wrote: What compiler are you using? VS Express |
|
| Author: | Robin [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 7:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Tony wrote: GIAKEN wrote: What compiler are you using? VS Express Grab a copy of Dev C++ |
|
| Author: | Labmonkey [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 11:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
dev c++ is pretty bad... I would say vs express is actually quite a good compiler. I haven't tested compile times, but it might just be using a lot of header files or something. C++ takes a lot longer to compile then vb because there is less standard. |
|
| Author: | GIAKEN [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 2:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Dev-C++ is the only compiler I have ever used. It's really nice. |
|
| Author: | Labmonkey [ Mon Apr 13, 2009 8:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
I was using dev C++ for one of my secret projects, but I decided it wasnt good enough. I did some research and people said vs express was pretty good so I tried it, and really think it is much better. I also tried codeblocks which was pretty good. |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
I used Visual Studio Team System 2008 for developing, but it IS 100% compatible with VS 2008 Express. |
|
| Author: | Nean [ Tue Apr 14, 2009 2:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
I also use Dev-C++ |
|
| Author: | rydinophor [ Sat May 02, 2009 9:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
hows the progress? i really doubt this will port to VB6 unless you use something like visual C++ 6, yet alone its almost unbearingly impossible to convert VB6 to VB.net, not only that but if you are using a winsock library, it will make this so much more confusing for the protocol to read such as this example: TCPClient(VB6 in WinSock) -----> String of Bytes Encoded and Sent -------------> Package Of Bytes Decoded In UTF8 or w/e you use ----> Visual C++ Server(System.Net.Sockets) String is messed up. If you see what I mean, I mean .NET is different then the old Visual Studio 6 package, so there could be some broke Bytes when decoded. And as well as that i'm sorry for the necro. Regards, Rydinophor |
|
| Author: | Matt [ Sat May 02, 2009 10:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
C++ isn't a .net language.. O.o |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Sat May 02, 2009 10:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Progress is very slow. And I'm using pure c++, not visual c++. I'm using Visual STUDIO, for DEVELOPMENT only. Even if I was, there are conversion procedures. |
|
| Author: | rydinophor [ Sun May 03, 2009 12:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
much better, so are you using codeblocks, bloodshed(Dev-C++), or custom? GCC, MingW, or custom compiler or different? If I could get those answers I'd be ready to download the software to my computer and wait until its in beta. |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Sun May 03, 2009 5:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Dragoons Master wrote: I'm using Visual STUDIO, for DEVELOPMENT only. http://www.microsoft.com/express/vc/ |
|
| Author: | rydinophor [ Fri May 08, 2009 12:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
yeah I know, I have that, the intellisense sucks terrible on it, if you type in a lower case letter to find the library it will give you an error, for instance: "system::" won't display compared to "System::", thats why i would rather use VB.net or VC#  .
|
|
| Author: | unknown [ Sun May 17, 2009 11:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
I would rather have notepad++, then you don't have to worry about intellisense or a clunky gde at all  Codeblocks is nice if you're coding cross platform.. If you're windows only than that visual studio is probably the way to go. |
|
| Author: | katcode [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
You're all retarded. IDE is all about Taste, If you like an IDE you dont have to force it on Other people. I used Dev-C++, Visual Studio Express and Code::Blocks and Programmer's Notepad and a bunch of others. By my Experience Visual Studio is the Best IDE currently, and Visual C++ is the best Windows Compiler (In comparison of Features to the other compilers). But i still stick to Code::Blocks because i like it, Thats it. I also use MinGW because i like the feel of using GCC. This war has nothing to do with Sides. Except Visual C++ 6.0 because even though the IDE is awesome everyone agrees it's complete shit. So yeah, Just pick a Compiler and IDE that are Standard Compliant enough. |
|
| Author: | Matt [ Thu Jun 04, 2009 3:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
katcode wrote: You're all retarded. IDE is all about Taste, If you like an IDE you dont have to force it on Other people. I used Dev-C++, Visual Studio Express and Code::Blocks and Programmer's Notepad and a bunch of others. By my Experience Visual Studio is the Best IDE currently, and Visual C++ is the best Windows Compiler (In comparison of Features to the other compilers). But i still stick to Code::Blocks because i like it, Thats it. I also use MinGW because i like the feel of using GCC. This war has nothing to do with Sides. Except Visual C++ 6.0 because even though the IDE is awesome everyone agrees it's complete shit. So yeah, Just pick a Compiler and IDE that are Standard Compliant enough. You're about 2 weeks too late on this. Shut up. |
|
| Author: | skillzalot [ Thu Jun 18, 2009 12:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Is this still being developed. I am slowly learning C++ and have been waiting to use this. Please update us Dragoons master |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Thu Jun 18, 2009 8:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
It will be done, someday, but my grad is just making me nutz. I'm 5:37 AM and I'm still awake... too many things to be done already. I'm practically out of time... |
|
| Author: | skillzalot [ Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
Ok then. Was only asking cause im learning to do C++ programming. |
|
| Author: | Dragoons Master [ Thu Jun 18, 2009 10:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: MSCPP Beta 0.1 |
No problem ^^ Still 7:52 AM and I did not came back home to sleep. Still at university. |
|
| Page 3 of 41 | All times are UTC |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|